· Case 9110 (Full Service): Client is an independent musician living with a disability. Client engaged an agent to assist in promoting Client's musical works. The agent has claimed that they have had no success in distributing Client's music, but Client has learned that his music is being played on various streaming platforms without his consent. Client is seeking counsel to determine if he has claims against the agent and/or these steaming platforms and, if so, assistance with pursuing the claim(s).

· Case 9693 (Full Service): Client is a founder of a curated market that values creating settings for original work to be appreciated through the organization of local events. Client was approached by a private membership club to embark on a creative partnership for the purpose of showcasing an exhibition in celebration of Black excellence through the works of Black artists in Philly. Client took concrete steps to execute the event, but the club cancelled the event within days of its planned opening and terminated the creative partnership with Client. Client seeks counsel regarding the potential legal claims arising from the terminated event and partnership.

· Case 9737 (Full Service): The client was awarded a grant to create a large sculpture for a park in collaboration with certain students within the community. While installing the artwork, a group of individuals began harassing the client, ultimately resulting in the sculpture having to be relocated to a less desirable area. The client also needed to buy new supplies and hire a construction team to assist with the move, incurring considerable expenses in the process. Client seeks counsel regarding the potential legal claims arising from the forced move of her installation.

· Case 9807 (Full Service): Client was a cast member and contributing editor of a podcast in which the cast members play a popular role-playing game. The members formed an LLC upon gaining a positive response online. Client has since left the podcast and is seeking advice on handling conflicts with the LLC including with respect to his shares and protection of the intellectual property he created while associated with the group.

· Case 9836 (Full Service): Client is a former member of a popular R&B group that had extensive touring. Client has been attempting to perform tribute shows to the group in the local area but has run into conflict with other former members regarding the rights to use the group's name. Client is seeking legal assistance to determine whether and, if so, to what extent he has the rights to use the name and is also seeking assistance with responding to a cease-and-desist letter from the owner of the relevant trademarks.

· Case 9843 (Full Service): The client is a mural artist in Allentown, Pennsylvania, where she was hired, as an independent contractor, to paint a mural at a church. The client did not waive any intellectual property rights. After the mural was completed and client was paid, the church expressed that some components of the mural were missing, and the artist offered to complete the mural according to the church’s wishes. A few months later, the artist found out that the mural was painted over with a different mural. The client would like advice and assistance in asserting whatever rights and remedies she may be entitled to for destruction of her intellectual property including, but not limited to, statutory damages and/or injunctive relief under the Visual Artists Rights Art.

· Case 9871 (Full Service): Client is an independent author who received a grant from a non-profit organization to fund her writing work. The organization began rejecting Client's requests for fund disbursement due to differing contract interpretations surrounding permitted use of funds. The client has since been unable to get in contact with the organization. Client is seeking counsel with determining whether she is entitled to the remaining funds and, if so, assistance with receiving them.